Elder Bush cave lies to the south
of Thor’s cliff in an outcrop of reef limestone. It overlooks the whole of the Manifold valley bottom from a position on the very skyline at an altitude of 275m.
View of Thor’s cliff from Elder Bush cave. N Barden July 2019.
The entrance to Elder Bush cave.
N Barden July 2019.
PastScape (2015) reports the
excavations thus: “Elderbush Cave was excavated by the Peakland Archaeological
Society between 1935 and 1952. The earliest finds were Pleistocene animal
remains, and some Upper Palaeolithic flint flakes. Some Mesolithic activity was
also attested. Some human bones are probably of Neolithic date, while the
Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age were apparently represented by pottery. The
Roman finds include a quantity of pottery, some fibulae, an iron knife, and
some whetstones. However, one of the Roman potsherds joins with a sherd from
Thor's Fissure Cave (SK 05 NE 30), raising doubts about the provenance of some
of the material. A quantity of animal bones were reported to have come from
"the Romano-British layer", but there are doubts about the precision
of the excavation techniques.”
This last point is indeed a
conundrum. However, Don Bramwell, was one of G. H. Wilson’s ‘Brotherhood of the
Pick and Shovel’ that excavated Thor’s Fissure cave, during Easter of 1930 - see
Wilson (1926) p. 21. He evidently kept some pottery in his collection and when
incorporated into the museum collection upon his death, may have been
mislabelled.
A detailed and well-illustrated summary
of the excavations by the director of the work, D. Bramwell was published in
1964. On the discovery of the cave he says: “The discovery of a wide-mouthed
cave, high on the slopes of the Manifold Valley near Wetton, Staffordshire,
raised the hope that some evidence of very early cave occupation by man might
at last be encountered in the limestone area. The discoverer of the cave Rev.
G. H. Wilson of Buxton, gathered together a corps of voluntary helpers to carry
out the exploration.. Through failing health Mr Wilson was unable to complete
the rather strenuous task of directing the work, so at a late stage the
responsibility passed into my hands.. Work at the cave extended from 1935 to
1952, apart from a break of four years due to the war.”
His description of the cave is as
follows:
“The cave as shown in fig. 1, is
only one part of a quite complex system of chambers and passages, all of which
were concealed until excavation began to reveal a series of five water worn
channels or swallets, below a rock ledge on the north east side of the chamber.
Entry into the lower system is gained by a steep descent of Swallet 1, which
soon levels out into a fissure-like chamber. From this fissure, narrow,
tube-like passages lead to a short vertical pitch into a second fissure which
formerly carried some fine stalactite formations, or alternatively into a low
chamber through which one can crawl to emerge into the bone cave, via Swallet
2. Swallets 3, 4 and 5 are still choked with clay but may repay further
digging. The small low chamber between Swallets 1 and 2, is the only part of the
lower system in which bones have been found, which had rolled down from the
main bone cave.”
Side view of Elder Bush cave drawn by Bramwell from Wonders of the Peak (2020).
Section drawing by Don Bramwell
from Wonders of the Peak (2020)
Noting that before excavation
sediments reached within 2 feet of the roof, Bramwell relates the stratigraphy:
“1. White clay. Excavation has
proved the cave to be a modified sloping fissure, fig 2, with a steep dip
towards the north east, therefore there is no level floor and this lowest
deposit of white clay clings to the sloping south west wall and extends to the
north west to unknown depths. No foreign material.
Bramwell’s Fig. 2, amended to
show the possible assignment of MIS stages to Bramwell’s stratigraphy.
2. Yellow sandy clay, lying
conformably on layer 1. No foreign bodies except geological.
3. Breccia of gritstone and
limestone. Found in the final chamber only. May be contemporary with layer two
and of the same parent material with the finer particles washed out. The cavity
found under the stalagmite floor, section C-D may result from this process (see
below).
Bramwell’s Fig 3. Original
caption reads: Section across the Final Chamber on the line CD. The skull is
that of a Brown Bear.
4. Massive stalagmite. This
overlaid the yellow clay in a significant area of the cave, but in the final
chamber formed the roof of several cavities (see above). In that chamber it
formed a solid floor, however its presence in the main chamber could only be
deduced by large broken slabs. Whether its collapse in the main chamber was due
to washout processes which created the cavity in the Final Chamber or whether
frost heave from ice within the clay precipitated the collapse is unclear.
5. Laminated grey clay. The
massive stalagmite of layer 4 was fairly, evenly covered with material. Its
laminated nature was assumed to be due to seasonal deposition, due to seasonal
runoff filtering through the cave roof. It had a thickness of ca. two feet and
5000 laminae.
6. Sand. This lay in an almost
uniform bed over the grey clay. Like all previous layers it contained no
organic remains.
7. Sandy cave earth. This layer
merged imperceptibly with the underlying layer imperceptibly. It was so named
because it contained bones. The absence of clay binding the sand particles indicates
dry conditions and indicates the sand probably has an aeolian origin. Bramwell
compares this layer to certain lower layers from Creswell Crags.
8. Flaky stalagmite. A limited
deposit found interstratified with layer 7 found in certain areas of the cave
assumed to be ‘wet patches’, near the cave mouth. Most fortuitously wind-blown
debris of leaves and insect wings was caught in this quickly forming stalagmite
and fossilized (see below).
Fossilized leaf and insect wings
from the ‘flaky stalagmite layer’ near the entrance of Elder Bush Cave.
Bramwell, fig 4.
a was determined to be Acer
monspessulanum, whilst b is the wing of a caddis fly, probably Microptera cf. nycterobia
9. Red cave earth. This stratum
formed the main bone-bearing stratum of the cave. It consisted of stiff red
clay with many darkly stained mammal bones and sub-angular limestone fragments.
The layer was subdivided in the middle, by an indurated layer or ‘pan’ about 3
inches thick. The fauna of lower section (hyena, lion and large bison)
indicated a warm climate, whilst the appearance of cold fauna higher in the
layer (reindeer, bear and fox) indicate a cold climate.
10. Transitional layer. Looser
than the underlying layer and merging imperceptibly with the overlying gravel
layer. Again, a cold fauna.
11a. Limestone gravel –
uncemented and therefore not a breccia. This occupied a considerable depth in
the main chamber. It did not occur in the Final Chamber but was replaced by the
interbedding of the flaky stalagmite layer in the (layer 8). It is conjectured
that it formed in a period of rapidly fluctuating temperatures. Seems to be a deposit
resulting from the rapid switches between glacial and temperate climate.
12. Post Glacial deposit. Brown
loam with limestones pieces, extending out of the cave and down the talus
slope.
Two interior views of the cave
photographed July 2019 by the author:
The fauna of the cave proved to
be quite interesting.
Layer 7 contained species of the
Eemian: Hippopotamus, lion, hyena, giant deer, wolf, large bison and hare.
Layer 9 lying directly over layer
7 in the majority of the cave marks a transition in climate from warm to cool.
It sees the lion, large bison and hyena continuing but cold adapted species
began appearing such as woolly rhinoceros, horse, cave bear, reindeer and
lemmings. By the middle of layer 9, hyena, cave lion, cave bear and woolly
rhinoceros, are replaced by red deer and wild pig. These last two are
indicative of woodland and hence the middle of layer 9 probably represents a
milder, interstadial period. Recalling that the bones in this region were
cemented with ‘pan’ also indicates a milder climate. Above this pan, still in
layer 9, the bones were mainly of reindeer, fox, bear and large bovid (auroch?)
– this is again a distinctly cold fauna.
Additionally Bramwell comments: “A
number of bones from this layer were found to have rolled down swallet 2 and
were preserved in a small chamber at the base of the swallet.” These included
the brown bear skull shown below.
Bear skull from Elderbush Cave, photographed shortly after discovery. Now on display at Buxton Museum and Art Gallery. From Wonders of the Peak (2020)
Sketch of a bear
skull from Elderbush Cave, Don Bramwell. PAS Collection, Buxton Museum. From
Wonders of the Peak (2020).
A later publication (Bramewll and
Shotton 1982) identifies the bear species as Cave Bear, Ursus spelaeus.
Layer 10, the transitional layer,
had a continuation of this fauna, but its looser drier nature allowed better
preservation of fragile specimens such as grouse and mallard. Both these bird
species, Bramwell posits are indicative of full glacial conditions.
Layer 11 contained only bones of
the large bovid. Also present were the bones of water vole and numerous
amphibian species. Bramwell hypothesises that their presence indicates the late
glacial stage.
Layer 12. Brown loam – possible
post glacial deposits.
Comparing the climate sequence Bramwell has inferred
from the cave stratigraphy to the MIS stages and their known climate, the
correspondence is remarkably good – see picture 5.
Now if we go on to look at the
archaeological finds from the cave we can also infer their dates and
tentatively who was occupying the cave.
These were:
Layer 9 (top) reindeer metacarpal
worked to a point – possibly a spear point or an awl. Bramwell assigned this to
the late Palaeolithic period – see picture below. No flint tools.
Bramwell Fig. 5. Bone tools from
Elder Bush Cave. a and b cheek pieces for a Bronze Age horse harness. c, bone
point possibly a spear point or an awl of Neanderthal (?) make.
Layer 10. 7 pieces of
worked flint. Six are figured by Bramwell – see Bramwell’s Fig. 6 below. He
comments: “pieces labelled a, b, and c, appear to have broken points, but they
have sharp cutting edges and might thus have been dual purpose tools”..
“similar unretouched blades have been found in the upper levels of Mother
Grundy’s Parlour, Creswell and Armstrong suggested that the Elder Bush material
may be Mesolithic. This is untenable in view of the strongly Late Pleistocene
facies of the fauna and I think they could equally well be Palaeolithic.”
Furthermore he commented on the one really diagnostic piece found (now
missing): “A backed blade, about 1 ½ inches long was the only tool with
secondary work”.. “However it was of the same white patination as those
figured..”
Bramwell Fig. 6 – stone tools
from layer 10
It is worth mentioning that this
type of backed knife is typical of Mousterian – Neanderthal tools. Other signs
of human occupation in this layer included bones of reindeer, split to obtain
marrow, charcoal from fire use and a cached reindeer thoracic region. Bramwell
concludes that the small quantity of debris found indicates a hunting camp as
opposed to a long period of occupation.
Layer 11 – a single large Bovid
vertebra.
Layer 12 – post glacial, of which
Bramwell says “The post upper Palaeolithic archaeology of the cave is less
significant as it was concerned with possible, Early Bronze Age, Early Iron Age
and Romano-British periods..” He did not however cover it in detail.
Bramwell (1964) Fig. 8. Early to
mid Bronze age finds form Elder Bush cave: Beaker pottery (a and b) and a
fibula (c)
On the stratigraphic, placement
of some of the bones found, perhaps including the bone point, Lewis et al. (2011)
made the following comments: “A record of hippopotamus together with reindeer
is known from Elder Bush Cave (Staffordshire; Bramwell 1964), where it is
thought that the reindeer was intrusive from overlying Devensian sediments.”
This is simply NOT the case! Here
is what Bramwell (1964) actually had to say on stratigraphy and the placement
of finds within it: “In any discussion of the fauna of Elder Bush Cave it is
necessary to note the method by which the sediments were excavated during the
earlier phase. This was at times liable to error for, from my observations,
level trenches were worked as far as possible, whereas my own section revealed a series of sloping beds,
particularly in the deeper and older deposits. Thus if a level trench were to
be made at the ninth foot (fig. 2), it would be liable to contain bones from layers
9 and 7, with consequent mixing of animals from warm and cooler climate. Thus I
have had to revise the provenance of a few of the bones from lower levels.”
So, Bramwell had already revised
where in the section, bones came from. Thus he is certain that the bone point
is from the top of layer 9.
He states this explicitly later in
his paper: “The oldest artifact in the cave, based on the stratigraphy, was the
metacarpal bone of a reindeer which had been shaped to a point and cut away at
the back. This was found in the topmost layers of the red cave earth, layer 9,
and so falls into the late Pleistocene period.”
Lewis et al. accept the
stratigraphy: “..the overlying Devensian sediments.” Yet he states that
reindeer bone was found with
hippopotamus.
What are we to make of this?
There are several possibilities. Lewis may simply, not have read the
stratigraphic description thoroughly and/or compared it with the published
section.
The bone to which Lewis is
referring, is another reindeer bone of which I am unaware of as it is
unpublished. This would contradict Lewis’ referencing of Bramwell’s 1964 paper
as his source.
Bramwell did indeed find
hippopotamus bones with reindeer and they were intrusive from above.
However, from the published
record, Lewis et al. (2011) have no evidence of this whatsoever.
Thus the dating of the reindeer
bone point stands. It dates to between ca. 85ka and 73ka. Therefore it is of
probable Neanderthal make.
On human remains Bramwell (1964)
makes no mention. However, in Bramwell (1950) he says: “The human remains are poor, consisting for
the most part of odd teeth and phalanges with no sign of an encisted burial.
Most of these remains occurred in the earth of the platform in front of the
cave.”
Interest in the age of the
Manifold Valley caves was undoubtedly sparked by Bramwell’s excavations. Rowe
at al. (1988) therefore, looked at a number of locations in the 1980’s.
They report their investigation
of Manifold Valley caves “In order to investigate the chronology of the
development of the Manifold Valley, speleothems were collected from twelve
fossil cave remnants and dated by the uranium – thorium method.. Much of the
calcite examined was detritally contaminated or too young to be of
significance, but two caves, Elder Bush and Darfur Ridge, contained flowstones
of sufficient quality and age to be of use in reconstructing the history of
valley incision.”
This sampling, of the speleothem,
formations of the cave revealed its importance: “Analyses of uranium and
thorium isotopes in calcite samples from thick flowstones within a high level
relict cave remnant (Elder Bush Cave) indicated that the formations were beyond
the range of the uranium-thorium dating technique (350 ka). 234/U//238/U
isotope activity ratios approached unity, suggesting that the flowstones may
have formed a considerable time before 350 ka. Palaeomagnetic samples taken
from cores drilled through the flowstones showed the presence of both normally
and reversely magnetized calcite. In some cases reversely magnetized layers
overlie normally magnetized layers. This evidence, taken in conjunction with
the uranium isotope data, is interpreted as indicating an Olduvai age
(1.66-1.87 Ma) for some of the flowstone horizons. It is suggested that the
cave became vadose by or soon after 2.0 Ma. The position of the cave near the
valley rim enables an estimate to be made of the maximum rate at which the
present valley has been excavated. This is calculated to be 5.5 cm/ka. Remnants
of old valley floors preserved within the existing valley suggest that
downcutting has been a continuous process. Flowstone from a cave on one of the
lower valley floor remnants (Darfur Ridge Cave) has been dated to 284 +34/-27ka
allowing a maximum downcutting rate since that time of 11.2 cm/ka. The
proximity of Elder Bush Cave to the valley crest suggests that its abandonment
marked the onset of the incision of the present system of dales that
characterize the English Peak District, presumably initiated by epeirogenic
uplift or tilting.”
Rowe (1988), Fig 3. Original
caption reads: Sketch plan of Elder Bush cave entrance chamber showing main
flowstone formations and locations from which cores and hand specimens and hand
specimens were recovered.
The work of Rowe et al. (1988)
therefore, emphasises the importance of short relict caves such as this in
Quaternary environmental reconstruction.
What then can we say of the
likely occupiers of the site? The earliest artifact, the point made from a
reindeer metacarpal likely dates between 85-70ka. As such it would be
Neanderthal.
Whilst bone tools have been
regarded as part of the package of human innovation arriving in Europe ca.
40-45,000BP Neanderthal bone tools are known from the archaeological record.
These include: Probable scrapers Gran Dolina, Spain 300ka Rosell et al. (2011);
Bone point Große Grotte Germany 100-50ka Albrecht et al. (1972); Bone
Retouchers, La Quina, France 71-57 ka Verna et al. (2011); Rib tools and bone
point Salzgitter Lebensted Germany 58-54 ka BP Gaudzinski (1999); Lissoirs
(hide/leather smoother) Pech-de-l’Azé I (Pech I) and Abri Peyrony, France
48-41ka Soressi et al. 2013; Grotta della Cala, Grotta del Cavallo, and Grotta
di Castelcivita, Italy bone awls 41-43ka d’Errico et al. (2012).
Additionally, Wenban‐Smith
(2010) has found a well dated Devensian, lithic assemblage in Kent proving
Neanderthals were in Britain during the period in question.
Whilst Rowe’s work does not in
any way confirm that Neanderthal’s lived at Elder Bush cave between 85 and
73ka, it does reliably show that the cave had its speleothems deposited by at
the latest, 730ka. Therefore, the sediment deposits that filled the cave, must
post-date this ancient epoch. In fact, notwithstanding interruptions during
glaciations, there was indeed more than adequate time for the cave to fill with
sediment to the great depth that Bramwell excavated.
It therefore seems that while the
evidence for Neanderthal occupation of Elder Bush cave is equivocal, it may
have, at least temporarily, been occupied by Neanderthals.
References
Albrecht, G., Hahn, J. and Torke,
W.G., 1972. Merkmalsanalyse von Geschoßspitzen des mittleren Jungpleistozäns in
Mittel-und Osteuropa (Vol. 2). W. Kohlhammer.
Benito, B.M. and G. Gil-Romera (2016) Eemian Distribution of Neanderthals via Authorea at https://www.authorea.com/users/8423/articles/72586-eemian-distribution-of-neanderthals/_show_article# accessed 27.04.19
Bramwell, D. (1950). Cave
Dwellers and Dens of Late Pleistocene Animals in the Manifold Valley,
Staffordshire. Transactions of the Cave Research Group of Great Britain, 1950,
Vol 1, Issue 4, p. 43-52
Bramwell, D. (1964). The
Excavations at Elder Bush Cave, Wetton, Staffs. North Staffordshire journal of
field studies vol. 4, Page(s) 46-60
Bramwell, D. and Shotton, F.W.,
1982. Rodent remains from the caddis-bearing tufa of Elder Bush Cave.
Quaternary Newsletter, 38, pp.7-13.
d’Errico, F., Borgia, V. and
Ronchitelli, A., 2012. Uluzzian bone technology and its implications for the
origin of behavioural modernity. Quaternary International, 259, pp.59-71.
Gaudzinski, S., 1999. Middle
Palaeolithic bone tools from the open-air site Salzgitter-Lebenstedt (Germany).
Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(2), pp.125-141.
Lewis, S. G., Ashton N. and R
Jacobi (2011). Testing Human Presence During the Last Interglacial (MIS5e): A
Review of the British Evidence in
Developments in Quaternary Science vol. 14 p. 131. N. Ashton, S. Lewis and C.
Stringer eds.
PastScape (2015) at https://www.pastscape.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=305632
accessed 17.07.19
Rosell, J., Blasco, R., Campeny
Vall-llosera, G., Díez Fernández-Lomana, J.C., Alonso Alcalde, R., Menéndez
Granda, L., Arsuaga, J.L., Bermúdez de Castro, J.M. and Carbonell, E., 2011.
Bone as a technological raw material at the Gran Dolina site (Sierra de
Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain). Journal of Human Evolution 61 (2011) 125-131
Rowe, P, Austin, T, and Atkinson,
T. (1988). Quaternary evolution of the British south Pennines from uranium
series and palaeomagnetic data. Ann. Soc. Geol. Belg. Vol. 111:1 p97-106
Soressi, M., McPherron, S.P.,
Lenoir, M., Dogandžić, T., Goldberg, P., Jacobs, Z., Maigrot, Y., Martisius,
N.L., Miller, C.E., Rendu, W. and Richards, M., 2013. Neandertals made the
first specialized bone tools in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 110(35), pp.14186-14190.
Verna, C. and d’Errico, F., 2011.
The earliest evidence for the use of human bone as a tool. Journal of human
evolution, 60(2), pp.145-157.
Wenban‐Smith,
F.F., Bates, M.R. and Schwenninger, J.L., 2010. Early Devensian (MIS 5d–5b)
occupation at Dartford, southeast England. Journal of Quaternary Science, 25(8),
pp.1193-1199.
Wilson, G. H. (1934) Cave Hunting
Holidays in Peakland.
Wonders of the Peak (2020) at: https://www.wondersofthepeak.org.uk/facts/don-bramwell-the-archaeological-artist/
accessed 10.06.20
ReplyDeleteHello Neil
In my opinion, Bramswell (1964)´s tentative chronological assignments for the layers of this site could indeed make sense… At least, the effects of alternating climatic variations, reflected in the geology and also mammal content on each layer, appear to follow a pattern “reasonably consistent” with that of the first third of the last climatic cycle; that is, between MIS5e up to MIS4.
Appart from this, Rowe (1988)´s dating of speleothemes (>730 Ka) adds a substantial element of judgement. In this sense, I agree too in that a so old “basal context” for Elder Bush Cave, strongly suggests that the infilling of the cave most probably began at ages well deep into Pleistocene…therefore making highly improbable a Mesolithic context for the archaeological layers 9, 10.
Respect to the lithics, I think you are right; despite of its appearance of being byproducts of Mode 4 laminar technologies, they could perfectly be Pleistocene too. The very frequent labeling of this type of tools as indicative of H. sapiens´s Upper Paleolithic and later periods, is not always a valid assumption… In fact, there´s evidence of laminar technology in Africa even since MIS8, and it was also present in some Neanderthal sites (which I looked for on the subject of your post), as is the case of Valdegoba site, Spain (with confirmed Neanderthal anthropological remains) dated at MIS3, where among the “signature” Mousterian/Levallois lithics, there is a considerable percentage of blades, flakes with a laminar trend, and other tools that have striking similarities with the ones found in layer 10, and shown in Fig.6. Here is the link to this paper, which is focused on the lithic assemblage found;
https://www.academia.edu/38538483/La_tecnolog%C3%ADa_l%C3%ADtica_neandertal_de_Valdegoba_en_el_contexto_del_Paleol%C3%ADtico_medio_de_la_Meseta_norte
Unfortunately, reliable dating methods on sediments such as Optically Stimulated Luminiscense (OSL) were not available until the 90´s, but if further research could to be faced at Elder Bush, perhaps only a single valid dating on any layer between 10 and 7 is all what is needed to properly scale, and probably to confirm as if, the whole of Bramswell´s stratigraphy.
Based on all the data you have published (in all terms, a very extensive analysis), I share your opinion about Elder Bush Cave…that is, that an archaeological context at MIS5/4 seems to be the most feasible one, and consequently their settlers only could have been Neanderthals from one of the successive waves that, since at least 250/300 ka ago, left their cultural remains in Britain.
Best regards
Marcelo